Existance of god

Europeans polled who "believe in a god", according to Eurobarometer in North Americans polled about religious identity Positions on the existence of God can be divided along numerous axes, producing a variety of orthogonal classifications.

Existance of god

Is there an argument for the existence of God? The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. Karl Marx asserted that anyone believing in God must have a mental disorder that caused invalid thinking.

The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche bluntly said that faith equates to not wanting to know what is true.

Objection 1. It seems that the existence of God is self-evident. Now those things are said to be self-evident to us the knowledge of which is naturally implanted in us, as we can see in regard to first principles. But as Damascene says (De Fide Orth. i, 1,3), "the knowledge of God is naturally implanted in all." Therefore the existence of God is self-evident. Question: "Is there an argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. In recent times, arguments against the. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that uses initiativeblog.com arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. If that organizational structure is true, the.

The voices of these three figures from history along with others are simply now parroted by a new generation of atheists who claim that a belief in God is intellectually unwarranted.

Is this truly the case? Is belief in God a rationally unacceptable position to hold? Is there a logical and reasonable argument for the existence of God? Outside of referencing the Bible, can a case for the existence of God be made that refutes the positions of both the old and new atheists and gives sufficient warrant for believing in a Creator?

The answer is, yes, it can. Moreover, in demonstrating the validity of an argument for the existence of God, the case for atheism is shown to be intellectually weak.

To make an argument for the existence of God, we must start by asking the right questions. We begin with the most basic metaphysical question: Reality is an illusion.

Reality is self-existent eternal. Reality was created by something that is self-existent. So, which is the most plausible solution?

Philosophy of Religion » Arguments for the Existence of God

So the possibility of reality being an illusion is eliminated. Next is the option of reality being self-created. The possibility of reality being self-created is one of those types of statements for the simple reason that something cannot be prior to itself.

If you created yourself, then you must have existed prior to you creating yourself, but that simply cannot be. Now we are left with only two choices—an eternal reality or reality being created by something that is eternal: The 18th-century theologian Jonathan Edwards summed up this crossroads: But the question now is, where does the evidence lead?

Does the evidence point to matter before mind or mind before matter?

Existance of god

To date, all key scientific and philosophical evidence points away from an eternal universe and toward an eternal Creator. From a scientific standpoint, honest scientists admit the universe had a beginning, and whatever has a beginning is not eternal.

Existance of god

In other words, whatever has a beginning has a cause, and if the universe had a beginning, it had a cause. All prove the universe is not eternal. Further, the laws that surround causation speak against the universe being the ultimate cause of all we know for this simple fact: This being true, no atheist can explain how an impersonal, purposeless, meaningless, and amoral universe accidentally created beings us who are full of personality and obsessed with purpose, meaning, and morals.

Such a thing, from a causation standpoint, completely refutes the idea of a natural universe birthing everything that exists.

So in the end, the concept of an eternal universe is eliminated. Mill not a Christian summed up where we have now come to: Or to put it in a logical set of statements: Can we infer things about Him from what He created?

In other words, can we understand the cause by its effects? The answer to this is yes, we can, with the following characteristics being surmised: Only cognitive being can produce cognitive being.

These things being true, we now ask if any religion in the world describes such a Creator. The answer to this is yes: He is supernatural Genesis 1: The former only needs to find a single red eagle to prove his assertion.

But the latter must comb the entire universe and literally be in every place at once to ensure he has not missed a red eagle somewhere and at some time, which is impossible to do.Question: "Is there an argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute.

Twenty Arguments For The Existence Of God by Peter Kreeft & Ronald K. Tacelli

In recent times, arguments against the. On the Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God of Saint Thomas Aquinas. The Five Ways of Proving that God Exists-- Summa Theologiae Ia, q. 2, a. 3. (See also Aquinas' other discussions of God's existence and his Natural Theology)..

Video Presentations on the Five Ways. This is a fascinating, densely-argued book. Essentially, Swinburne examines the probability of God’s existence; he does not press for proofs of God’s existence that would compel belief.

Aquinas on God's Existence. The question of proving the existence of God by natural reason is at the core of what has come to be known in Thomistic circles as Natural Theology (as opposed to the supernatural Theology of Sacred Scripture).Unless God is known to exist, one cannot have any other knowledge about Him.

They have also believed that an effective rational argument for God's existence is an important first step in opening the mind to the possibility of faith—in clearing some of the roadblocks and rubble that prevent people from taking .

Aquinas on God's Existence. The question of proving the existence of God by natural reason is at the core of what has come to be known in Thomistic circles as Natural Theology (as opposed to the supernatural Theology of Sacred Scripture).Unless God is known to exist, one cannot have any other knowledge about Him.

What is the Ontological argument for the existence of God?