Even if women and men have the same rights in our society, gender issues such as equal pay, sexual discrimination, domestic violence, motherhood etc. The main goal of this analysis is to point out the fact that a Victorian character can be relevant to postmodern women. Although attitudes toward feminist issues are different today than they used to be in the Victorian Age, things may have not changed as much as we might think.
If yes, what is your graduation year? We want to talk about what makes a character, writer, or piece of writing feminist, and how the evolution of society impacts the way that we write about women in literature. The real question, though, is if that silhouette's messy hairdo is feminist.
After all, do we want a teen girl in her high school English class to learn from her reading material that her purpose in life is to serve her husband? I sure hope not. This is the kind of woman that I want to be.
Before examining the feminist merit of a novel, we need to define what feminism means. I think that feminism is about having complete and total agency over our lifestyle and choices, regardless of race, Jane eyre and feminism orientation, gender identity, and any other facet of our being.
I do believe, though, that within the context of Victorian England, Jane Eyre could be considered feminist, but only to an extent. This is the crux of the problem, though—society has thankfully grown enough in the past couple hundred of years that what may have seemed incredibly feminist in the nineteenth century is antithetical to twenty-first century feminism.
Jane Eyre focuses largely on the gothic, mysterious relationship between Jane and Rochester, the man who owns the estate where Jane is a governess.
As I flip through my copy of Jane Eyre, I notice an uncomfortable trend: It's okay to be boy-crazy and still feminist! On her wedding day, Jane finds out that Rochester is already married to a manic woman trapped in the attic of the estate Okay, Rochester.
Shortly after the reveal, Rochester implores Jane to begin their life together far away in a romantic French villa. Instead, Jane tries to support herself by working various jobs around the countryside until she faints on a doorstep.
Fast-forward a bit in the plot. A man named St. John asks Jane to marry him and work as a missionary in India. Jane declines because she does not love him. Good for you, Jane. He is, however, physically handicapped and blind. And they all lived happily ever after Love and respect are not enough—Rochester must benefit when Jane takes care of him in his weakened physical state, and Jane must benefit when she elevates her social status by marrying a rich man.
I reject the idea that Jane was inferior to Rochester to begin with. Sure, he is of a much higher social class Jane was a governess in his estate, remember? I think this is what makes me feel so uncomfortable when Jane Eyre is referred to as a major feminist novel.
Morality is great and all, Jane, but I think that there are other protagonists out there who can more effectively prove to women that they are people who matter outside of their reproductive and marital abilities. Again, high school writers should check out our free, annual online Summer Mentorship Programwhich opens to applications every year in mid-February, as well as our Adroit Prizes for Poetry and Prosewhich recognize spectacular high school and college writers each year.
You may also like to check out some additional helpful content we have for high school students, such as the Vol.
Tips for Young Writers Series.Feminism in Jane Eyre Another example of oppression from men on women was shown when Jane Eyre was sent to Lowood by her Aunt Reed.
Mr. Brocklehurst, the owner of Lowood, makes an example of Jane Eyre and shuns her in front of the whole class. Jane Eyre was first published as Jane Eyre an Autobiography in under the pseudonym of Currer Bell.
The edition used here was published in and Michael Mason has edited an introduction and notes about Jane Eyre and Charlotte Bronte.
I think this question can be interpreted in at least two different ways - namely: whether Jane Eyre is a text conducive to feminist criticism, and whether Jane Eyre (the protagonist) is herself a feminist (or at least a proto-feminist).
The short. I think this question can be interpreted in at least two different ways - namely: whether Jane Eyre is a text conducive to feminist criticism, and whether Jane Eyre (the protagonist) is herself a feminist (or at least a proto-feminist). The short.
quotes from Jane Eyre: ‘I am no bird; and no net ensnares me: I am a free human being with an independent will.’. A Feminist approach to Jane Eyre. Victorian character made relevant to postmodern women. by Cristina Budeanu, Școala Gimnazială Filipeni, Bacău Keywords: feminism, marriage, sexual discrimination, gender, identity, ”marriageability”.