Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. The Bill of Rights was simply the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was made for all of the people governed by the separate and independent nations included in the United Nations. The key difference in the documents rests not in the words, but in the audiences to which they speak to and of. Comparing the one complete declaration of laws, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and part of another, Bill of Rights as part of the US Constitution, is very different from a comparison of both documents as a whole.
They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement… both provide for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate… both seek a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government… and both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government.
Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government. But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different.
These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough.
Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to reverse and avoid. The framers of the U. Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action.
Length and Language Whereas the U.
Instead, public officials must amend the constitution if they wish to act outside of the detailed language set forth in the basic law. The location of language in each document is also revealing. Whereas specific civil liberties in the U.
Constitution are mostly listed in amendments known as the Bill of Rights, a Bill of Rights forms the very first article of the Texas Constitution. The Executive Branch Whereas the U. Constitution creates a unitary executive that concentrates executive power in the president, the Texas Constitution creates a plural executive that disperses executive power across multiple elected offices, thereby fragmenting the executive branch of government and preventing power over the executive branch from concentrating in any one individual or office.
The line-item veto in the Texas Constitution allows the governor to veto specific items contained within appropriations bills passed by the legislature.
At the federal level, however, the U. Supreme Court has ruled the line-item veto unconstitutional, arguing that it violates the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The fact that the Texas Constitution provides for a line-item veto demonstrates an affinity for limited government and limited spending, even if it comes at a cost of granting power to the governor in a way the rest of the constitution is designed to avoid.
The Legislative Branch Legislatively, there is very little in the U. Constitution that limits the tax and spending policies which U.
Representatives and Senators may write into law. In Texas, however, detailed restrictions on tax and spending policies significantly restrict what state legislators are actually allowed to write into law. For example, legislators are constitutionally forbidden from implementing a tax on personal income or allowing the state government to go into debt, and the constitution mandates that specific percentages of the state budget be spent on specific policy areas, most notably for public schools and universities as stipulated in Article 7.
Congress is a full-time, professional legislature that meets annually; members of Congress make their living as elected officials.Get an answer for 'What is the relationship between the 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights?' and find homework help for other Law and Politics questions at eNotes.
Bill of Rights amendments. Similarities and Differences Between English Bill of Rights and the Declaration Rights of Man and Citizen Words | 8 Pages.
Similarities and differences between English bill of rights and the declaration rights of man and citizen Bryan.
Bill of Rights & Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen Essay. The ten amendments don't directly address the rights of individuals, instead allow the government to enforce them, such as; congress will make no law inflicting rights of speech, press, and religion. Similarities and Differences Between English Bill of Rights .
The Bill of Rights are the first 15 rights amended to the united states of America. The rights following those 15 rights are known as amendments due to they can be more easily mended into new law.
Feb 09, · What is the difference between a constitutional amendment bill and an ordinary bill? Update Cancel. Apart from that constitution also lays down the rights of citizens, duties of the state, election procedure, powers of all the organs of the government and some other things.
What is the difference between inward bill for . The Bill of Rights is the proposal made by the first United States Congress, contained in a document commonly called the Bill of Rights, to amend the newly-ratified United States Constitution with *twelve* amendments intended to limit the power of the new federal government.